This PR address a concern that I have and was mentioned in #13.
iris_lama haven't published yet a binary for ROS. This means that people need to compile it from source to test it.
I think one of the limitations to do that is that iris_lama must be correctly "catkinized". At the same time, I agree with you in keeping this library ROS independent.
This PR address a concern that I have and was mentioned in #13.
iris_lama haven't published yet a binary for ROS. This means that people need to compile it from source to test it.
I think one of the limitations to do that is that iris_lama must be correctly "catkinized". At the same time, I agree with you in keeping this library ROS independent.
I had to face the same problem with BehaviorTree.CPP.
In this PR you can find a little trick to to detect catkin in cmake.
Note that if you decide to merge this PR, I will need to also update accordingly iris_lama_ros.