Open SwooshyCueb opened 1 month ago
The use case for this is not clear.
That comes from a time when we used Jenkins. The reason we continued to use it is likely due to the fact that it was quicker (at the time) to leverage the plugin build/test hooks for testing instead of building new functionality from the ground up.
Let's consider removing this subdirectory requirement.
Yes please. We've always wanted to remove that requirement, but other things always took priority.
So we have it written down somewhere: | Distro | os_specific_directory |
---|---|---|
Debian 11 | Debian gnu_linux_11 |
|
Debian 12 | Debian gnu_linux_12 |
|
Ubuntu 20.04 | Ubuntu_20 |
|
Ubuntu 22.04 | Ubuntu_22 |
|
Ubuntu 24.04 | Ubuntu_24 |
|
CentOS 7 | Centos linux_7 |
|
Almalinux 8 | Almalinux_8 |
|
Almalinux 9 | Almalinux_9 |
|
Rocky Linux 8 | Rocky linux_8 |
|
Rocky Linux 9 | Rocky linux_9 |
ew, those spaces.
At present, when running plugin tests, the testing environment must be pointed at a directory containing a subdirectory that has the plugin packages. The name of this subdirectory comes from a clunky python function copied from ansible. The use case for this is not clear. Let's consider removing this subdirectory requirement.