Closed JockeJarre closed 1 year ago
Thank you @JockeJarre for your interest in OpenMcdf. MPL 2.0 license has no alternative formal definition with or without appendix B: the License says that if Initial Owner wants to specify that the software is released in an "incompatible way with Secondary License software she/he has to include Exhibit B to source code to specify her/his will (MPL 2.0 - 10.4). And that's not my will so the Exhibit B ("Incompatible With Secondary Licenses" Notice) is NOT added to any of the source code files.
Best Regards, Federico
Thank you for confirming so quickly!
Is it intentional that the licence used is MPL 2.0 with Appendix B - "Incompatible With Secondary Licences" added?
As I understand it, this Appendix B makes it more complicated to combine with GPL software? What are your thoughts on this?