Review: Endnotes

[vr8hub]

• [x] In endnote 3, the reference to Bentley's Works should be tagged; "Works" in this instance is the title of a collection of his … works. See here.
• [x] In endnote 19, is the κ.τ.λ. an abbreviation? If so, it should be tagged as such (we tag even foreign language abbreviations). This should be true throughout, if there are others.
• [x] I'm not sure what, if anything, you want to do about this. As an example, note 24 references Humboldt's Ueber die Verschiedenheit des menschlichen Sprachbaues. But that "Ueber" is actually "Über" (see here). Now, the scans have Ueber, so this is not a transcription error. I know why they printed Ueber (they went with phonetics rather than accuracy in characters), but … Do we care? I'm not sure.

[irontigran]

κ.τ.λ. is an abbreviation that is roughly equivalent to "etc." (https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/%CE%BA%CE%B1%CE%B9_%CF%84%CE%B1_%CE%BB%CE%BF%CE%B9%CF%80%CE%AC).

I've marked all instances of it as an abbreviation.

[irontigran]

I don't really have an opinion on Ueber vs. Über, other than being inclined to leave it the same as the scans. Would that count as an editorial change?

[vr8hub]

It would be (editorial), but I'm fine if you want to leave it.

[irontigran]

Ended up adding the umlaut - I've done a lot of editorial commits in the name of making references easier to google for the reader, and this seems to be in the same line of reasoning.