Open adrianbroher opened 9 years ago
For the sake of completeness:
I agree to licensing gnome-shell-extensions-sensors to the GPLv2 or any later version of the license.
I, too, agree to licensing gnome-shell-extensions-sensors to the GPLv2+ license.
I agree to licensing gnome-shell-extensions-sensors to the GPLv2+ license.
Although, personally I'd prefer something like MIT or BSD for simplicity, both of which are GPL compatible.
I agree to GPLv2+ for this extension
Il giorno mar 9 giu 2015 14:20 Tharre notifications@github.com ha scritto:
I agree to licensing gnome-shell-extensions-sensors to the GPLv2+ license.
Although, personally I'd prefer something like MIT or BSD for simplicity, both of which are GPL compatible.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/xtranophilist/gnome-shell-extension-sensors/issues/124#issuecomment-110336564 .
I agree to gpl v2+ for this extension
I agree to my contributions being licensed as GPLv2+, or, at your option, any other FSF-approved free software license.
I agree to my contributions being licensed as GPLv2+, or, at your option, any other FSF-approved free software license.
I agree to my contributions being licensed as GPLv2+, or, at your option, any other FSF-approved free software license.
Sorry I am late for this. Well I respect your choice, mate. Thank you for makeing this thing, which I've always wanted to say.
I agree to my contributions being licensed as GPLv2+, or, at your option, any other FSF-approved free software license.
Hello everybody,
as you may know this project does not contain any license file or license statement. While I don't know the legal implications of not having any license, I would like to point out that the extensions.gnome.org page requires the extension maintainer to release the extension under the terms of the GNU Public License version 2 or later.
Therefor I would like to ask every contributor to agree to change/apply the GPLv2 license to this project by stating his agreement this issue.
Why I'm asking specifically for the GPLv2 license you may ask; there are two reasons:
List of contributors (ordered as reported by the contributors list) agreeing to the licensing: