search

isa-camss / CAV

The Core Assessment Vocabulary represents and defines what an “Assessment” of “assets” is and how to perform the assessment based on “Criteria”. It is a domain-agnostic vocabulary, meaning that it can be used to assess any type of assets.
3 stars 1 forks source link

Remove CAMSS example from definition of cav:Includes #10

Open costas80 opened 3 years ago

costas80 commented 3 years ago

The definition for property cav:includes of class cav:Scenario includes CAMSS as an example:

The aggregation of criteria to one scenario or parts of it. Additional Information: This aggregation may be contextualised at different granularity levels, scenario, parts of the scenario or specific criteria. The cardinality is 0..* to allow assessments that are very high-level, informal or subjective without criteria and scoring. *For CAMSS the cardinality is 1...**

Given that these definitions will be published for the use case agnostic CAV, I would refrain from referring to the CAMSS as an example. The CAV definitions will not otherwise provide any context towards what CAMSS is and doing so, or inserting the discussed example, would make suggestions on the provenance of the CAV (apart from being unclear).

paulakeen commented 3 years ago

I do agree, however at some point and somewhere we need to come up with clear Use Cases for the CAV. An Annex to the CAV, perhaps? or a separated deliverable within CAMSS? For the time being we have identified a few already (they discovered us, in fact):

  1. CAMSS
  2. IMAPS and similar maturity assessment models (IQAT, etc., which may be kind of sub-scenarios of one more generic scenario);
  3. ePO (AwardResult and/or AwardDecision) treated as specialisations of CAV Assessments, e.g. the MEAT Pilot
  4. ITB (automated issuing of validation assessment reports)
costas80 commented 3 years ago

An annex sounds fine. I would propose any place basically that is not in the definition itself.