The Core Assessment Vocabulary represents and defines what an “Assessment” of “assets” is and how to perform the assessment based on “Criteria”. It is a domain-agnostic vocabulary, meaning that it can be used to assess any type of assets.
Is there a specific reason why for some properties you use dublin core (dct:description), while in other cases you define your own properties (cav:type) without directly aligning them to dublin core (dct:type for instance)?
This is a mistake, see issue #16 : all these editorial changes have an impact on the RDF-based serialisation and need to be corrected before producing the artefacts.
Is there a specific reason why for some properties you use dublin core (dct:description), while in other cases you define your own properties (cav:type) without directly aligning them to dublin core (dct:type for instance)?