isaacg1
commented
9 years ago I like the } adition, there's no downside there. For s, I don't like that as much. There are cases where you want to call s on an int and have it return itself, such as when you don't know whether a number is an int or a float. I would use the (presently unused) S<int> instead.
Maltysen
Ranges inclusive of the end value is useful in many golfs, but missing from pyth. We can overload
<int>forsand<int, int>for}to accomplish this. I had to make}ac_to_ffor this, however.sdoes[1, a+1]and}does[a, b+1].