Implicit Input Inside Lambdas

[Maltysen]

The implicit Q is really nice, but I feel that inside lambdas like m it really isn't appropriate. For example, mhs{*MyP. This will take implicit input from Q, but it is very rare that I would want the P to also take from Q.

So I propose that inside lambdas, when closed with ; or EOF, that the implicit input should not be Q but instead the innermost lambda var. For instance, the above example would expand to mhs{*MyPdQ

[isaacg1]

This is great, I like this a lot.

[isaacg1]

Implemented