The else statement .? right now requires you to manually deindent with )'s or ;. However, there is no need to make them deindent that final level, as that is already unambiguous.
I made .? a replacement parse that adds a ) before the else. This lets you do things like IQ1.?2. Even in the case where you want to deindent multiple layers with a ; and then do an else, it only adds an extra blank line, and doesn't add any extra chars: IQVQN;.?_1.
This is a change to .?, not I, so it'll work for all the other control structures else works with.
The else statement
.?right now requires you to manually deindent with)'s or;. However, there is no need to make them deindent that final level, as that is already unambiguous.I made
.?a replacement parse that adds a)before the else. This lets you do things likeIQ1.?2. Even in the case where you want to deindent multiple layers with a;and then do an else, it only adds an extra blank line, and doesn't add any extra chars:IQVQN;.?_1.This is a change to
.?, notI, so it'll work for all the other control structures else works with.