Open smrgeoinfo opened 2 months ago
It looks like the raw field has this:
"currentArchive": "National Mineral Collection, Smithsonian Institution",
"currentArchiveContact": "pohwatp@si.edu"
under supplementMetadata
The classification
is not present in the record we have in our database.
The word dioptase
shows up in two places:
"fieldName": "Dioptase with calcite and quartz",
and
"material": "Dioptase>Mineral",
Our original view of the record is here: https://central.isample.xyz/isamples_central/thing/IGSN%3ANHB000TLJ?format=original
in the SESAR record I obtained using the export service,
curl "https://central.isample.xyz/isamples_central/export/create?q=id:IGSN\:NHB000TLJ&export_format=jsonl" -H "Authorization: Bearer <JWT>
The sample is a mineral at the Smithsonian Museum of Natural History. The information at geosamples.org (https://app.geosamples.org/sample/igsn/10.58151/NHB000TLJ)
has this information:
Classification: Dioptase Field Name: Dioptase with calcite and quartz ... Current Archive: National Mineral Collection, Smithsonian Institution Current Archive Contact Details: pohwatp@si.edu ...
Relevant Links: http://grscicoll.org/cool/ipjg-ikz6: Department of Mineral Sciences (Global Registry of Scientific Collections) http://n2t.net/ark:/65665/3876d4a94-1726-42aa-bf5d-d918ea5f974b: Smithsonian collections record for NMNH 125875-00 (MIN)
That does not appear in the iSamples export JSON. Is this getting lost in the generation of the export JSON (doesn't appear in the API thing/{identifier} JSON either, not present in the metadata we're harvesting (it should be...), or lost in the harvest process?
I'd suggest the classification could be appended to the label for NMNH samples, added as a keyword, or classification and fieldName could be appended in the description. The CurrentArchive information should be in curation/curation_location and curation/responsibility/contact_information