Open gernotstarke opened 1 week ago
proposal (1): add marty kleppmann, designing data intensive applications, started working on that in branch #511-LG-1-06-add-references.
@gernotstarke Would "How to Design Programs" and "Schreibe Dein Programm!" work?
would be fine for me. Could you add these to the references too, please?
@gernotstarke They are already in the references, PR #516 adds links to the LG itself.
Do we have a more specific reference for this? I find both "How to Design Programs" and "Schreibe Dein Programm!" very broad and not that helpful if one wants to figure out what is meant by "products and sums" in this context.
Maybe a glossary entry would be more helpful than a book reference in that case
There exists a glossary entry for sums and products in the new glossary. @mikesperber and myself are writting a blog entry about sums and products. We could add a reference to that.
There exists a glossary entry for sums and products in the new glossary. @mikesperber and myself are writting a blog entry about sums and products. We could add a reference to that.
You can check out here how that's shaping up:
I think we should reference the glossary entries. Once the blog article is published, we can reference that in the curriculum and/or the glossary.
Please, @mikesperber and @skogsbaer , propose one or a few references for data modelling in your sense, especially for sum and product.
My proposal would be a book or article which adresses practical aspects and is general purpose, not a theoretical treatment.
E.g. https://www.turingtaco.com/algebraic-data-types-structuring-data-in-functional-programming/ is a counter-example from my point of view, as I consider it overly specific for our purpose in foundation-level. I wouldn't want that as a reference in foundation.