Closed scottstanie closed 3 years ago
Hi, I am not sure why you are trying to form interferograms with the UAVSAR product with simulated NISAR looks and ground spacing
SLC products. The ISCE2 software is not designed to process the simulated NISAR products. The ISCE3 software is being developed to process NISAR data, including the UAVSAR products with simulated NISAR format.
There are the UAVSAR SLC stack products for this line (see https://uavsar.jpl.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/product.pl?jobName=SanAnd_23511_01 if you have a UAVSAR.jpl.nasa.gov account) that are already processed for InSAR analysis with precise coregistration between all the dates in the stack. The UAVSAR SLC stack products can be processed with the ISCE2 stripmapStack workflow.
Thanks @EJFielding , I'll check out the pre-made stack for comparison. I wasn't sure if ISCE3 was ready, so I've been adapting ISCE2. I can close this issue if it's something that has no plan to be added into ISCE2.
I'm running into a few issues trying to form an interferogram with two (zero Doppler processed) UAVSAR PolSAR slcs.
My first question is- is stripmapApp.py the right application to process this? Or is there another that people more regularly use?
The data I'm using comes from here, where I downloaded the "VV".slc files, and the annotation files.
https://uavsar.jpl.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/product.pl?jobName=SanAnd_23511_14068_001_140529_L090_CX_02#data https://uavsar.jpl.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/product.pl?jobName=SanAnd_23511_14128_002_140829_L090_CX_02#data (For this, i've selected the "UAVSAR product with simulated NISAR looks and ground spacing", which has the .slc binary images and not the HDF5 files)
FIrst I came across this:
I saw that a
POLARIZATION
component was in the UAVSAR_HDF5_SLC file that was not here, so I addedThat led to the following error, which I'm having more trouble tracking down:
I also noticed that
uavsar_polsar
is not listed in theFactories.py
list of sensors which wouldn't be "RAW": https://github.com/isce-framework/isce2/blob/main/components/isceobj/StripmapProc/Factories.py#L55 This means it is sayingReference data is in RAW format. Adding _raw to output name.
. It's also not listed as a possible option for theisZeroDopplerSLC
, but I'm not sure if that matters. Changing the code for either of these does not fix theNo input port named sensor
issue.Here are my XML files: