I have a question about the performance. "This is in comparision to 75.54% that is acheived by using train_iter_20000.caffemodel released by authors, which can be replicated by running this file . The .pth model converted from .caffemodel using the first section also gives 75.54% mean IOU. " But when I checked the model file and the trained .pth file, I found that the model applied ASPP instead of LargeFOV, which means the model performance should have achieved 76.35% as depicted in the paper. Why the performance is 75.54?
I have a question about the performance. "This is in comparision to 75.54% that is acheived by using train_iter_20000.caffemodel released by authors, which can be replicated by running this file . The .pth model converted from .caffemodel using the first section also gives 75.54% mean IOU. " But when I checked the model file and the trained .pth file, I found that the model applied ASPP instead of LargeFOV, which means the model performance should have achieved 76.35% as depicted in the paper. Why the performance is 75.54?