Closed uhermjakob closed 2 years ago
I added various related resource links to this GitHub's README.txt.
Let's definitely work out a clear setup. How about the following:
We are already using (2). For (1) and (3), we should compare them and:
My reasoning is that it is easy for many people to contribute to a google doc, so that is good for rapid iteration, but it is also good to have a clear place where people can look and know they are reading the agreed on standard.
@ejwood19 and @uhermjakob, how does that sound?
Thanks @jkkummerfeld. I think (1) and (2) are working well now. Looks like we are able to manage without (3) for now, but I'm certainly open to add a Google doc in the future as needed.
A little over a month ago, I started supplementary Diplomacy AMR annotation guidelines (https://www.isi.edu/~ulf/amr/lib/amr-dict-diplomacy.html) to complement the general AMR annotation guidelines (https://github.com/amrisi/amr-guidelines/blob/master/amr.md, https://www.isi.edu/~ulf/amr/lib/amr-dict.html) and announced at our weekly meetings, our slack channel and the AMR Diplomacy Google doc.
Today, Tess made multiple references to Sara's list of AMR guidelines, which seem to at least partially overlap.
Could you let us know how you propose the two relate: Is Sara's list meant to be something of a scratch list with ideas that might go into the existing guidelines, or a replacement, or something complementary?
The resource I created is of course work in progress. Feel free to suggest additions, clarification, or changes. I have not had any feedback so far.