Closed qpwo closed 5 years ago
Merging #55 into master will increase coverage by
0.1%
. The diff coverage is94.73%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #55 +/- ##
=========================================
+ Coverage 90.66% 90.76% +0.1%
=========================================
Files 6 6
Lines 621 639 +18
=========================================
+ Hits 563 580 +17
- Misses 58 59 +1
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
immutablecollections/_immutableset.py | 90.47% <100%> (+0.12%) |
:arrow_up: |
immutablecollections/_immutabledict.py | 87.8% <93.33%> (+0.76%) |
:arrow_up: |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update e1daaa9...14080a9. Read the comment docs.
Do we want immutablesetmultidict_from_unique_keys
and immutablelistmultidict_from_unique_keys
and associated kwargs?
Probably not, because the point of the multidicts is to associate a single key with multiple values. A user would fully expect multiple keys to appear.
Oh I think this might be ready to merge then
Did you already make tests for
ImmutableSet
?
Yes that was in PR 54
These are the coding standards: https://github.com/isi-nlp/isi-flexnlp/blob/master/docs/coding_standards.rst
I don't see the "boolean arguments should always be keywords" rule there, but I remember discussing it. @berquist , can you add it?
@rgabbard Discussion was here, btw: https://github.com/isi-nlp/isi-flexnlp/issues/266#issuecomment-360886337 . (You can see me being quite confused about how this works in Python in that discussion :).)
Initial draft. I forgot some things in PR 54 that @ConstantineLignos pointed out; should I fix those in this PR?