Open sharon-indegy opened 5 years ago
Just saw in your blog how much pain these GnuPG flags cause, I'm sorry to have raised yet another one of those.
First, I'd like to echo, "Hi first let me thank you for this brilliant library."
Second, the bug is a little noisy, but nothing is actually broken.
On WSL2/Debian, latest pip download available as of today ... Requirement already satisfied: gnupg in ./venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages (from -r requirements.txt (line 1)) (2.3.1)
Reading ... which I think relates ... https://gnupg.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ "New in version 0.4.2: The keyid and username of the signing key are stored in the key_id and username attributes of the result, if this information is provided by gpg (which should happen if you specify extra_args=['--verbose'])."
And ... https://github.com/gpg/gnupg/blob/master/doc/DETAILS
"DECRYPTION_KEY
I'm currently working around with ...
$ diff _parsers.py.orig _parsers.py 1654a1655,1656
elif key == 'DECRYPTION_KEY': pass
Hi first let me thank you for this brilliant library.
Repro: import gnupg
gpg = gnupg.GPG(homedir="my .gnupg") decrypt = gpg.decrypt("valid msg omitted, works with 'gpg -d' ")
print decrypt.ok print decrypt.data
I get: Exception in thread Thread-2: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.7/threading.py", line 801, in __bootstrap_inner self.run() File "/usr/lib/python2.7/threading.py", line 754, in run self.target(*self.args, **self.__kwargs) File "/home/sharon/.local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/gnupg/_meta.py", line 650, in _read_response result._handle_status(keyword, value) File "/home/sharon/.local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/gnupg/_parsers.py", line 1757, in _handle_status super(Crypt, self)._handle_status(key, value) File "/home/sharon/.local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/gnupg/_parsers.py", line 1656, in _handle_status raise ValueError("Unknown status message: %r" % key) ValueError: Unknown status message: u'DECRYPTION_KEY'
False the-decrypted-str-just-fine
I think it's a small matter of adding DECRYPTION_KEY to the 'pass' section of the relevant handler. But will take me some time to verify so letting you know right away.
Also, possible that I have an old version compared to this repo, used pip install on debian testing.
Please let me know if more info or testing by me is needed. Great work!