Open whyxz opened 1 year ago
Hi, Thats strange, that would mean there were no valid ground truth depth values in the eigen crop for that image. Could you visualize the ground truth depth for the sample you're getting this error for?
Thank you, I'll give it a try.
The issue seems to be here on line 96. Changing -1 to 9 will prevent NAN from occurring, but the results are not very satisfactory. I printed out the predicted results and ground truth and found a large discrepancy.
The official GT provided is like this.
Thanks for sharing the details. Can you recheck what is the min and max for this ground truth (before capping the max in line 96)?
After dividing GT by 1000, it seems that the unit is no longer meters
My guess is that, for some reason, your Ground Truth depths are off by a factor of 10 or so. Can you try dividing by 10000 and checking the results?
This may happen if we acquired the data from different sources or if the official dataset has changed since (format or data itself) (We have had the dataset for more than two years now).
Thank you for reply, I'll give it a try.
Hi,I divided it by 10,000 and the result is still very strange. Could you please share your test set with me?
ruth depth values in the eigen crop for that image. Could you visualize the ground truth depth for the sample you're getting
I met the same problem, maybe the author did not use the official SUNRGBD datasets from the website.
Hello, may I ask why the evaluation metric is NaN and the error message shows "mean of empty slice" when testing on SUNRGBD dataset?