Closed strogonoff closed 6 months ago
How should this data be modelled (AKA what data format is Paneron expecting)? @strogonoff
You can create a proposal & see YAML for yourself.
I created one as an example, see registerManagerNotes, controlBodyNotes & dates: https://github.com/isogr/registry/blob/master/gr-registry/proposals/06c61279-3f84-4b1a-99d0-05c6cfb7cff1/main.yaml
To describe the sponsor, the “stakeholder” field on the “propose” transition can be used.
@strogonoff I have updated the data to include "register_manager_notes". I have changed timeproposed and timedisposed to dateproposed and datedisposed. I have added the name of the sponsor but data is modelled differently than what you expect (based on your comment just above). We use, in fact, the sponsor field to include this piece of data.
Can you have a look at one proposal included in this PR and let me know if this is what you are expecting? Thanks
You can create a proposal & see YAML for yourself.
Can we have some documentations on how to perform operations in Paneron? I honestly cannot remember how to create a Proposal (see also https://github.com/isogr/register-system-transition/issues/44#issuecomment-1954134904), as the system does not allow me to perform such operation
For some reason now I am able to. Can this be something related to caching or some settings that need to be reset in the Paneron app? I simply restarted the app and the button was clickable.
Perhaps, would be good to reproduce later…
I see register_manager_notes
, that’s incorrect spelling, should be registerManagerNotes
. For timestamps, instead of dateproposed
and datedisposed
we use timeProposed
and timeDisposed
.
Missing data has been included in https://github.com/isogr/registry/commit/0d8876a53d46247bcc6d3f766a1738e5f78a33f2
Can we close this @strogonoff ?
In the management information of transformations 484 or 739, the following data is missing that we should migrate: