Closed dcm9123 closed 4 years ago
Hi again, the racon log message says the process was killed, which usually happens when you run out of memory. Can you tell me how much RAM you have and how large are the input files for the 3 datasets that did not finish?
Best regards, Robert
Sure, no problem. My barcode84.fastq file is 58 MB, and its ava84.sam file is 80 GB. The barcode86.fastq file is 31 MB, and its ava86.sam is about 89 GB. The last one is about 85 GB in the sam file and 40 MB for the fastq. The three sam files are definitely the largest of all of my samples, could that be it? Also, I am running it in a server, where I request the following:
#BSUB -n 20
#BSUB -R "span[hosts=1]"
#BSUB -R "rusage[mem=4500]"
#BSUB -M 5000
Should I increase the ram memory and try it out?
Thanks!
Yeah, try allocating at least 100GB as all overlaps from the SAM file are stored into memory.
Yes, that was it! Thanks again!
Hi! It's me again! I am having a new problem and I am not sure what could be happening here... So, according to issue #140 I performed the following commands to get my fasta nanopore reads corrected:
Minimap2 command:
minimap2 -ax ava-ont --dual=yes barcode84.fastq barcode84.fastq > ava84.sam
Racon command:
racon -u -f -w 50 -q 9 -t 20 barcode84.fastq ava84.sam barcode84.fastq > barcode84_polished.fasta
However after it's done running I am getting an empty file as a result. This happens across three of my 96 samples. The head ant tail of my minimap2 output of my sample 84 looks like this:
minimap2 head -n 10:
minimap2 tail -n 10:
The head of the barcode84.fastq file looks like this:
The tail looks like this:
The racon output message looks like this:
I noticed the error at line 13 from the previous output, however the line 13 on the ava84.sam file looks like this:
@SQ SN:6e8c4f51-e8ad-4059-b40b-4e273c696dad LN:416
and the barcode84.fastq file looks like this:
@87f34c90-58aa-4383-a20d-82aac14e374d runid=7c6c69b0c1ae60abfe91b0d0c44ea2031ed4d1a4 read=41 ch=383 start_time=2019-08-01T00:25:39Z flow_cell_id=FAL13168 protocol_group_id=cpmp_and_msp2 sample_id=cpmp_and_msp2
Do you know what could be the problem in this case? I am getting similar output across other 2 samples, the 93 remaining are just fine.
Thanks again!