Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
[deleted comment]
Hi Carlos,
Thanks for your comment. I haven't focused to the performance yet. ;)
Currently, this implementation creates new RTMP::Session, RTMP::SessionReader,
RTMP::SesstionWriter when
user connects. But this may consume pretty much memory i think. However, I've
noticed the cpu issue. I don't
know a lot about Ruby raw performance on TCP server use, so I'll start to write
some test codes to compare C
and Ruby performances.
Takuma
Original comment by takuma...@gmail.com
on 30 Mar 2008 at 9:22
Takuma:
You rock! I was going to rubyforge to make new project plan for an RTMP server!
Nice project!
Are shared objects implemented ? ?
We need more buzz on this, may I (with your permisson) spread the word on
osflash and friends?
Carlos: Brazil on flex on rails? =D
Original comment by chad...@gmail.com
on 2 Apr 2008 at 11:26
Original comment by takuma...@gmail.com
on 2 May 2008 at 7:11
Original comment by takuma...@gmail.com
on 2 May 2008 at 7:12
Ruby green thread seems too slow to serve many connections. I think we need to
rewrite for using asyncronous
socket.
Original comment by takuma...@gmail.com
on 2 May 2008 at 7:16
I've comited r45 (for trunk) and r46 (for branches/eventmachine). The
branch/eventmachine is the test version of
using Ruby/EventMachine.
Original comment by takuma...@gmail.com
on 8 May 2008 at 7:34
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
egen...@gmail.com
on 29 Mar 2008 at 3:22Attachments: