istio / istio.io

Source for the istio.io site
https://istio.io/
Apache License 2.0
761 stars 1.54k forks source link

istio.io blogs real estate issue #14556

Open linsun opened 9 months ago

linsun commented 9 months ago

When reviewing our blogs on istio.io, i noticed that we have too many spaces on the left and right side. Seems wasting a lot of real estate. This makes blog a little hard to read. See screenshot:

image
dhawton commented 9 months ago

I can take this on

linsun commented 9 months ago

cc @craigbox as you designed the new site if you have any input

linsun commented 9 months ago

Thanks Daniel!!

craigbox commented 8 months ago

Hah, I just found this through searching as to why the width of the blog posts had changed!

The reason they were the width they were is that there's a maximum words per line that lets people read the fastest. That's why newspapers are laid out in columns, for example. Research suggests it actually makes things easier to read.

I would suggest we revert this, but I'm hoping we will have some resources to do a more thorough

If nothing else, we should be consistent with content pages like https://istio.io/latest/about/service-mesh/.

dhawton commented 8 months ago

I don't know if I agree with the line length for readability. With websites, there is a move to reduce excess whitespace... for example, for people with 2k-4k monitors, it seems odd to have 50% or more just be blank space on the edges for a blog post. Modern "newspapers" seem to go have adopted the fluid content model as well when it comes to individual articles. As far as consistency across the different sections, I agree with this... but it seemed like there were multiple and different definitions across the CSS. I was going to address this, but saw a comment about a rewrite (not aware of any timelines, however).

craigbox commented 8 months ago

Get yourself an ultra-wide monitor, sit in the middle of it, and then measure the neck strain trying to read content that is hard left :)

dhawton commented 8 months ago

I basically have that with 3 32 inch screens. ;)