Open Stevenjin8 opened 4 days ago
Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all
😊 Welcome! This is either your first contribution to the Istio documentation repo, or it's been a while since you've been here. A few things you should know:
You can learn about how we write and maintain documentation, our style guidelines, and the available web site features by visiting Contributing to the Docs.
In the next few minutes, an automatic preview of your change will be built with
a full copy of the istio.io website. You can find this preview by clicking on
the Details link next to the deploy/netlify
entry in the status section of this
page.
We care about quality, so we've put in place a number of checks to ensure our documentation
is top-notch. We do spell checking, sanitize the Markdown, ensure all hyperlinks point to a
valid location, and more. If your PR doesn't pass one of these checks, you'll see a red X in the
lint_istio.io
entry in the status section. Click on the Details link to get a list of the
problems with your PR. Fix those problems and push an update; this will automatically re-run the
tests. Hopefully this time everything will be perfect!
Once your changes are accepted and merged into the repository, they will initially show up
on https://preliminary.istio.io. The changes will be published to https://istio.io
the next time we do a major release (which typically happens every 3 months or so).
To publish them sooner, add a cherrypick/release-x.xx
label, where x.xx is the current
release of Istio.
Thanks for contributing!
Courtesy of your friendly welcome wagon.
Hi @Stevenjin8 thanks for updating the page! I have 1 question regarding the sidecar numbers, I saw it is more than ambient + L7 - just wanted to confirm it is the default profile without HBONE being used?
Note the numbers from 1.21 on sidecar is much better: https://istio.io/v1.21/docs/ops/deployment/performance-and-scalability/
Hi @Stevenjin8 thanks for updating the page! I have 1 question regarding the sidecar numbers, I saw it is more than ambient + L7 - just wanted to confirm it is the default profile without HBONE being used?
Note the numbers from 1.21 on sidecar is much better: https://istio.io/v1.21/docs/ops/deployment/performance-and-scalability/
@linsun I believe it is the default profile without HBONE. when I look at the traffic, none of it goes to port 15008.
Hi @Stevenjin8 thanks for updating the page! I have 1 question regarding the sidecar numbers, I saw it is more than ambient + L7 - just wanted to confirm it is the default profile without HBONE being used? Note the numbers from 1.21 on sidecar is much better: https://istio.io/v1.21/docs/ops/deployment/performance-and-scalability/
@linsun I believe it is the default profile without HBONE. when I look at the traffic, none of it goes to port 15008.
hmm, do you think we regressed sidecar numbers so bad? Or the difference lies in setup and measurement?
Hi @Stevenjin8 thanks for updating the page! I have 1 question regarding the sidecar numbers, I saw it is more than ambient + L7 - just wanted to confirm it is the default profile without HBONE being used? Note the numbers from 1.21 on sidecar is much better: https://istio.io/v1.21/docs/ops/deployment/performance-and-scalability/
@linsun I believe it is the default profile without HBONE. when I look at the traffic, none of it goes to port 15008.
hmm, do you think we regressed sidecar numbers so bad? Or the difference lies in setup and measurement?
Hi @Stevenjin8 thanks for updating the page! I have 1 question regarding the sidecar numbers, I saw it is more than ambient + L7 - just wanted to confirm it is the default profile without HBONE being used? Note the numbers from 1.21 on sidecar is much better: https://istio.io/v1.21/docs/ops/deployment/performance-and-scalability/
@linsun I believe it is the default profile without HBONE. when I look at the traffic, none of it goes to port 15008.
hmm, do you think we regressed sidecar numbers so bad? Or the difference lies in setup and measurement?
I'll do some digging, but its hard to tell because there isn't a lot of information about the test setup. Then again, we're not doing anything crazy so it shouldn't matter too much?
@linsun Is it even possible for sidecar to sidecar traffic to be over HBONE? I couldn't find any docs on it. All HBONE documentation seems to be under Ambient mode.
Also, I do think the sidecar numbers are right. John ran similar tests (albeit locally on a kind cluster) and got similar numbers
DEST CLIENT QPS CONS DUR PAYLOAD SUCCESS THROUGHPUT P50 P90 P99
hyper fortio 1000 1 5 0 5000 999.75qps 0.391ms 0.523ms 0.818ms
hyper fortio 1000 4 5 0 5000 999.30qps 0.412ms 0.623ms 1.552ms
hyper fortio 1000 16 5 0 4992 996.77qps 0.445ms 0.651ms 1.535ms
hyper fortio 1000 64 5 0 4992 987.42qps 0.494ms 0.818ms 1.895ms
hyper fortio 1000 128 5 0 4992 975.06qps 0.480ms 0.841ms 1.904ms
hyper fortio 1000 265 5 0 4770 947.34qps 0.459ms 0.768ms 1.909m
Description
Update performance and scalability docs for 1.24
xref: https://github.com/istio/istio/issues/52977
Reviewers
Need someone to update the chinese version