Closed Einlar closed 2 years ago
A few small things that confused me during testing. I think they are correct on spid-saml-check.
This PR fixes the following:
case-29.xml
case-69.xml
case-98.xml
case-99.xml
<saml:AttributeStatement>
A few small things that confused me during testing. I think they are correct on spid-saml-check.
This PR fixes the following:
case-29.xml
andcase-69.xml
). It makes more sense for test 29 to check the Response Issuer instead.case-98.xml
andcase-99.xml
are missing the<saml:AttributeStatement>
altogether, but their description explicitly says that it should be present.