It is possible to check for active states in guards using the active() function. But the final states are not provided as options. These are simply missing in the list of state identifiers. This is the missing functional aspect, We will add those identifiers so that you can specify:
`[ active( StateA.r1._final_) && active (StateA.r2._final_)]`
It is possible to check for active states in guards using the
active()function. But the final states are not provided as options. These are simply missing in the list of state identifiers. This is the missing functional aspect, We will add those identifiers so that you can specify:This feature is derived from issue #3215.