Open jserv opened 4 years ago
Thanks for your suggestion, kernel module and user space programs on SOFA have the same licensing terms (Apache 2.0). And I agree that the app and kernel module should be packaged separately. Our team will discuss this issue tomorrow. Thanks a lot.
Thanks for your suggestion, kernel module and user space programs on SOFA have the same licensing terms (Apache 2.0). And I agree that the app and kernel module should be packaged separately. Our team will discuss this issue tomorrow. Thanks a lot.
To comply with Linux kernel licensing model, sofa kernel module would be clarified as dual-licensing (GPLv2 or Apache) as #4 addressed.
The build script attempts to package
sofa.ko
into single RPM, that causes several problems:To overcome the above, decoupling Linux kernel modules from sofa package is a feasible approach. That is, there should be at least two packages: 1) sofa service/utility; 2) sofa kernel module for Linux;