Meta - enclose checklist in an <details> accordian tag

[killerrook]

Checklist

• [X] I made sure that there are no similar feature requests - open or closed.
• [X] I have taken the time to fill in all the required details. I understand that the feature request will be dismissed otherwise.
• [X] This issue contains only one feature request.

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

The checklist is pretty long and repetitive, monotonous, and eye sore when going through lots of issues

Describe the solution you'd like

Decluttering by using details accordian tag

Additional context

• Even if this is not achievable to do in the issue template, this can be done using the bot - similar to the one implemented for auto-resizing the images
• the checklist accordian need not be open by-default, since presence of unchecked items is shown clearly in the github issue UI - and knowing that some "task" is not done, the interested person can easily open the details accordian

[itsdrnoob]

The checklist is pretty long and repetitive, monotonous, and eye sore when going through lots of issues

It's just 3 options, why collapse it?

[killerrook]

It's just 3 options, why collapse it?

Page looks a little bit cleaner would also be useful if you decide to add more things like i checked faq, etc.

[itsdrnoob]

Page looks a little bit cleaner

But for the person opening an issue, they might completly miss the checklist due to the reason that it is collapsed, and will be unable to submit the issue.

[killerrook]

Collapse after the issue is created using bot or use asterisk* mark which will prevent opening the issue without checking all options in checklist

[itsdrnoob]

Collapse after the issue is created using bot or use asterisk* mark

The asterisk mark is already in use. And why use a bot for something that is not even an actual issue?

[killerrook]

Just a suggestion rest is upto you

On Sat, Nov 12, 2022, 11:36 PM Dr.NooB @.***> wrote:

Collapse after the issue is created using bot or use asterisk* mark

The asterisk mark is already in use. And why use a bot for something that is not even an actual issue?

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/itsdrnoob/DataMonitor/issues/70#issuecomment-1312540799, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AG37PFU6XEL3AJIE2MLQYYDWH7MDTANCNFSM6AAAAAAR6MZ4DA . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>

[itsdrnoob]

Just a suggestion rest is upto you

I do appreciate the suggestion, but I don't think it's quite necessary.