I just uploaded the bibliography for the 'Innateness and Contemporary Theories of Cognition' article (labeled in the SEP database as: 'SEP innateness-cognition') and I'm viewing it through Firefox. The screenshot attached is the first citation I ran across when I was going through it to clean things up. It may or may not help, but I wanted the coders to know what the system spit out for a citation with (what appears the be a problem with) numbers and decimals within the title of the citation; but why would 'should' and 'not' end up in the author's section? Something like this isn't necessarily unusual, but this particular one stuck out to me and I figured it'd be an interesting case to see what the code/implementation of the data itself is doing to label in pubs as such.
Fellow SEPers,
I just uploaded the bibliography for the 'Innateness and Contemporary Theories of Cognition' article (labeled in the SEP database as: 'SEP innateness-cognition') and I'm viewing it through Firefox. The screenshot attached is the first citation I ran across when I was going through it to clean things up. It may or may not help, but I wanted the coders to know what the system spit out for a citation with (what appears the be a problem with) numbers and decimals within the title of the citation; but why would 'should' and 'not' end up in the author's section? Something like this isn't necessarily unusual, but this particular one stuck out to me and I figured it'd be an interesting case to see what the code/implementation of the data itself is doing to label in pubs as such.