In this issue, I document my experiments in training and testing a region-based nnUNet.
The model takes into input a Nifti image and outputs the spinal cord (value=1) and the MS lesions (value=2).
The fact that it is region-based means that lesions must be in the spinal cord.
The necessary steps to take are :
[x] Segment SC for images which have lesion seg but no SC seg (with SCT v6.2)
[x] Manually correct the SC segs
[ ] Build an nnUNet dataset
[ ] Train a 2D region-based nnUNet (with normal loss and no smoothing loss)
[ ] Train a 3D region-based nnUNet (with normal loss and no smoothing loss)
In the CanProCo dataset as well as in the stc-testing-large dataset, some subjects were missing a SC segmentation.
For the 33 CanProCo subjects, the SC was segmented using the region-based model trained on CanProCo (release).
They were then manually corrected and pushed to CanProCo on branch plb/add_sc_seg_for_regionbased
For the 186 sct-testing-large subjects, the SC was segmented using the contrast-agnostic-sc-seg model from SCT v6.2. They were then manually corrected and pushed to sct-testing-large on branch plb/add_sc_seg_for_regionbased
In this issue, I document my experiments in training and testing a region-based nnUNet. The model takes into input a Nifti image and outputs the spinal cord (value=1) and the MS lesions (value=2). The fact that it is region-based means that lesions must be in the spinal cord.
The necessary steps to take are :