Closed ivanpaulovich closed 5 years ago
What would the use case be here? Would the name be passed as a third argument to the function with the signature (handler, request)
?
HI @mikesol,
The usage would be as a new argument for the Send<T>()
and Publish()
methods.
The current implementation uses a Dictionary of pipelines with the Request Type
as Key, it would be nice that for every RequestType would exists a List of named Pipelines.
This changes would add fine grained control to the developer.
Got it. Is the idea then to have some sort of pattern matching like redis, ie if you have foo:bar
foo:baz
and bar:baz
and then send to foo:*
it will pick up the channels with the right prefix?
Yes, that would be great!
Find in release v0.4.3
I wish to Send or Publish to a named pipeline