Closed msdemlei closed 1 year ago
I wonder if an example below the added text would be useful or commonplace.
On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 05:22:43AM -0800, Marco Molinaro wrote:
I wonder if an example below the added text would be useful or commonplace.
I think you'd have my vote. I was also thinking about naming-and-shaming the max thing for SODA polygons...
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 10:47:20AM -0800, Tom wrote:
@tomdonaldson requested changes on this pull request.
I agree with @molinaro-m that examples would be very helpful here. Illustrating each of array, non-array, and xtype would make the text easier to digest.
Hm... we could say we want to do a better job here than in other places, but frankly, if I made a priority list of where the spec should add examples, this one would not be in the top 10 :-)
+\previousversion[http://www.ivoa.net/documents/VOTable/20191021/]
- {http://www.ivoa.net/documents/VOTable/20191021/
- (V1.3 2013-09-20)}
Cut and paste oversight?
Blush. Fixed in a separate commit. Thanks for paying attention, and this clearly is a thing that ivoatex should be automating.
When merging, I'd suggest squash-merging, as that commit will be silly in the global history.
+ivoatex/Makefile:
This is a good idea!
It's what the the ivoatex template has done since commit 7f384017 (Jan 2021). I have thought about some way to implant it into the Makefiles of the existing specs but figured anything automatic probably is too fragile. So, I'm adding these as specs are being updated.
Cut and paste oversight? Blush. Fixed in a separate commit.
I'm not seeing another commit. Was it pushed as well? I could just make the change on this end but didn't want to confuse things if it's already in the works on your side.
I've added issue #32 to see if someone is inspired to add an example for this case.
On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 07:06:59AM -0800, Tom wrote:
Cut and paste oversight? Blush. Fixed in a separate commit.
I'm not seeing another commit. Was it pushed as well? I could just make the change on this end but didn't want to confuse things if it's already in the works on your side.
Clearly not. Sorry.
On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 07:24:56AM -0800, Tom wrote:
(V1.4 2019-10-21)}
Ah, as I said: this needs automation. Force-pushed a fix, please discard your clarify-min-max-literals branch.
The PR also starts the WD cycle for 1.5.