search

ivocavalcante / PrusaSlicer-snap

PrusaSlicer Snap package.
5 stars 6 forks source link

Version 2.8.0 #25

Open antonpiatek opened 4 months ago

antonpiatek commented 4 months ago

Closes #24

RafaelZasas commented 4 months ago

What is the status of this?

antonpiatek commented 3 months ago

@ivocavalcante ?

ivocavalcante commented 3 months ago

Sorry people, been MIA due to personal issues lately. Tried simply changing tag to 2.8.0 but it didn't work, something must've changed upstream. Will have to look more carefully.

Em qua., 21 de ago. de 2024, 03:41, Anton Piatek @.***> escreveu:

@ivocavalcante https://github.com/ivocavalcante ?

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/ivocavalcante/PrusaSlicer-snap/pull/25#issuecomment-2301253329, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACZDP3J3ENVULZY3QKOHPITZSQZC7AVCNFSM6AAAAABK2FWVCSVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDGMBRGI2TGMZSHE . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

migimli commented 3 months ago

thanks for looking, your snap makes this so more useful than the appimage on a linux machine! hope you are ok now!

ftmiranda commented 2 months ago

Thank you for looking into it. To be fair, there is a newer version than 2.8.1, now I think it is 2.8.1 already in stable state

ftmiranda commented 2 months ago

@ivocavalcante did you see these comments at the official Prusa github? It is quite likely that PrusaSlicer will switch only to Flatpak deployment from the next version on. The AppImage made sense when it could be used in the "bundle what you need, distribute a single file" way, but having to distribute several different AppImages and maintaining the required build infrastructure (and still worrying about what needs to be updated when some Linux distribution update is released) means burning time that we would much rather invest into actual work on PrusaSlicer.

ftmiranda commented 1 month ago

Any news on the 2.8.1? Thank you

ftmiranda commented 1 week ago

Just a friendly reminder, any news on the progress of getting 2.8.1 or later available ?