More treats! MOAR TREATS!

[Hyperfresh]

To people passing by and reading this: please leave a comment on what treats you want to give, and iwa or I will find a way to implement them!

Describe the feature you'd like to add Yep, people want more than the Tronkys.

Describe the alternatives you've considered (I mean we can just leave it at the Tronkys if need be too that's fine)

This is basically a mental to-do for me to make more treat-giving commands for those treat-givers. Again, don't be obliged to do the hard lifting :)

[iwa]

i'm gonna add a little note somewhere so people can be aware of the existing flavours

[LuigiDAN125]

Twix, Wispa, Mars Bar, Malteasers, Choccy Milk, Gummies, Cola, Popcorn, Sherbet Lemon, Crisps - few ideas of mine

[SuperTux20]

Snickers, KitKats, Pocky, peanut butter cups (given with ?pbcup maybe), and the humble yet ever-present lollipop.

[Hyperfresh]

Hm, what's the best way to put this altogether?

• It might be worth maybe expanding the existing ?tronky command: changing it to ?treat and make the syntax ?treat <type of treat (keep in mind treats with spaces (like cocoa tronky) too)> <mentions>.
• Or, we make a separate command different to ?tronky, works similarly but for all the treats suggested here.

What would be the best way to approach this...?

[SuperTux20]

What would be the best way to approach this...?

I think the ?treat candybar @mention would be a good way of going about it.

Maybe after the @mention there could be another optional arg for flavor or variety if it applies, instead of it being grouped with the candy itself? (e.g. tronky @mention cocoa, kitkat @mention white chocolate, milky way @mention midnight)

[Hyperfresh]

Hm. I think varieties should go before the mention (it gets kinda complex if you have the candy, then the mention, then the variety- wouldn't ot make more sense with candy, variety then mention?)

[LuigiDAN125]

If a candy bar had a space in it (eg choccy milk) you could have it as ?treat ChoccyMilk @mention so you dont have spaces... just an idea

[iwa]

the best way would be to implement them as one command, like that : ?treat (the treat type/name) (mentions & flavour, in whatever order)

mentions and flavour can be mixed, that's not a problem, just need to keep the treat name as strictly first argument

and yeah @LuigiDAN125, it'll be easier to write compound names as one word. I'll make that non-case sensitive so caps won't be a big deal

[LuigiDAN125]

Also idea is ?candyshop to see what u can give or something idk

[Hyperfresh]

?help treat will suffice, @LuigiDAN125.

I'll get to work on this feature soon:tm: - I've got a bit of schoolwork to juggle at the moment so this feature might take me a while.

[iwa]

edited the ?tronky command to be ?treat (60e81e78120e7fdf4ff193a6c09e509ddbdcc999) it's now versatile, we just need to add the other treats and flavours

NB: i'll add a system to manage emotes later

[Hyperfresh]

add cookies for aj as a treat

[iwa]

closing the issue, that thing is over now x)