iwu78 / csp-blog

Personal blog documenting journey through computer science with work and projects.

MIT License

0 stars 0 forks source link

Web Programming Basics Log | Ian’s CSP Blog #5

Open utterances-bot opened 1 year ago

utterances-bot commented 1 year ago

Web Programming Basics Log | Ian’s CSP Blog

Review ticket for web programming basics

https://iwu78.github.io/csp-blog/log/2023/09/27/Web-Programming-Basics-Log.html

trevorhuang1 commented 1 year ago

I can tell you put a lot of effort into this test!

hanlunli commented 1 year ago

HTML code incorporates the wireframe representation in the hacks (+0.5)

Javascript code cell in notebook creates 2 objects, California and Nevada, performs operations on elements in each object to modify and log data (+0.5)

Javascript code includes a function that modifies HTML code to change link. (+0.5)

Has a javascript code cell that compares 2 numbers, A and B, that returns the greater one (+0.5)

Has code cells that show corrections made to the 3 code cells, corrected code functions as intended (+0.5)

Each notebook has utterances and reviewer comments (+1)

Has a summary review ticket that summarizes all changes made and explains code (+0.5)

iwu78 commented 1 year ago

Self Grade:

All hacks are completed and attempt to go beyond instructions given, read above for more details (+2.4)

Notebook has all hacks working and up, and has reviewer comments (+0.9)

Review ticket describes in detail everything done, slightly unclear about what instructions mean by keep track of all grades of others. Comments of peer grades are above (+0.4)

advikg commented 1 year ago

0.5/0.5: The HTML code is relevant to the wireframe and answers the prompt directly, also has a little extra CSS and JavaScript that makes it functional.
0.5/0.5: The Javascript is complicated but works, very cool how you were able to modify the elements in the arrays.
0.5/0.5: The JavaScript code to swap links is pretty cool, I also loved the games that you made!
0.4/0.5: The greater number function is pretty simple but functions well enough, and it answers the prompt directly.
0.5/0.5: The error corrections are very thorough, and the improvements to the code make sense. Great job!
1/1: Each notebook has reviews and utterance comments.
0.3/0.5: I don't see much collaboration, this is also evident with how you have your own separate blog rather than a group one.

Overall, a really good job.