Closed mnovelo closed 7 months ago
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Comparison is base (
b4027cc
) 98.95% compared to head (0f1f021
) 98.95%.
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
I'm also confused why .rspec-local
is not respected. And my initial idea was to use config.filter_run_excluding
but I was afraid of false exclusions when not expected... I have an alternative idea though on how to fix this.
Closing since a better approach is in https://github.com/ixti/sidekiq-throttled/pull/182
Not sure how this got dropped, but this line is needed to prevent the Sidekiq Pro specs from running in Sidekiq 6.5.
Also,
.rspec-local
isn't actually being respected, so updated guidance to mention.rspec