Closed izlatkin closed 3 years ago
https://github.com/sosy-lab/sv-benchmarks/blob/99d37c5b4072891803b9e5c154127c912477f705/c/loop-new/gauss_sum.i.p%2Blhb-reducer.c coverage is expected to be higher and covered conditions main__sum = main__sum + main__i; main__i = main__i + 1; label_87:; if (main__i <= main__n) { main__sum = main__sum + main__i; main__i = main__i + 1;
main__sum = main__sum + main__i; main__i = main__i + 1; label_87:; if (main__i <= main__n) { main__sum = main__sum + main__i; main__i = main__i + 1;
gauss_sum.i.p+lhb-reducer.smt2.txt log.txt
The SMT file has a lot fewer branches than we see in the source code... perhaps because SeaHorn optimized it a lot. Anyway, the coverage should be much better now.
yes, coverage it definatly better
https://github.com/sosy-lab/sv-benchmarks/blob/99d37c5b4072891803b9e5c154127c912477f705/c/loop-new/gauss_sum.i.p%2Blhb-reducer.c coverage is expected to be higher and covered conditions
main__sum = main__sum + main__i; main__i = main__i + 1; label_87:; if (main__i <= main__n) { main__sum = main__sum + main__i; main__i = main__i + 1;
gauss_sum.i.p+lhb-reducer.smt2.txt log.txt