Closed laktak closed 10 years ago
@laktak I'll see what I can do -- thanks for pointing this out, hadn't even occurred to me :+1:
Just wondering -- how do you normally clone from GitHub if this doesn't work?
Thanks!
Our firewall is ok with cloning via https:
(instead of git:
).
Our firewall is ok with cloning via https: (instead of git:).
Ahhh, right. Could you try something for me, to verify a potential solution:
https://github.com/izuzak/atom-pdf-view/
atom-pdf-view
package.json
file so that the pdf.js dependency uses git+https://...
and not just git://...
apm install
and let me know if it installs the package properlyThat should work as far as I can tell, but just want to double-check before committing changes. Thanks again!
Yep, it works.
But why don't you want to bundle it? The download would be a lot smaller than cloning the whole repo.
But why don't you want to bundle it? The download would be a lot smaller than cloning the whole repo.
I'm not super-opposed to it and I do agree that the smaller size would be a benefit.
Still, having it this way makes more sense to me at the moment. For example, when I want to update to a new version of pdf.js -- the pull request for that would probably be huge and not be relevant for this project (because it would show the diff between two version of the bundled version). Just bumping the SHA of the commit for which version of pdf.js is cleaner and simpler for humans.
Thanks again for reporting this :bow:
Could you please bundle pdf.js? We are behind a firewall and cloning from github fails: