Closed j-faria closed 6 years ago
Do you mean that the counts of the black curve are more variable over bins than the blue one? Perhaps try with more samples - but this could easily happen since it's MCMC rather than independent sampling, especially if the 'save interval' is low when you do this.
On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 3:26 PM, João Faria notifications@github.com wrote:
Running kima from the main directory with the maximum number of levels set to 1, followed by
kima-checkpriors 0 --code "samples=np.random.uniform(-47.6, 74, size=nsamples)"
gives something like
[image: kima_prior_possible_bug] https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1958991/39611951-b3d6504c-4f31-11e8-8583-b0d7f4d1b1f0.png
shouldn't they be more similar?
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/j-faria/kima/issues/34, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABgVOmtO4cW5UjgFJp4ou7YNNHS3CyOtks5tu8pfgaJpZM4TyESg .
-- Dr Brendon J. Brewer Department of Statistics, The University of Auckland, New Zealand Ph: +64 27 500 1336 Web: http://www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~brewer/
Of course, you're right that's it. I did set the save interval to 1, but I wasn't expecting such a difference. With more samples it's less striking. Thanks!
Running
kima
from the main directory with the maximum number of levels set to 1, followed bygives something like
shouldn't they be more similar?