search

jOOQ / jOOL

jOOλ - The Missing Parts in Java 8 jOOλ improves the JDK libraries in areas where the Expert Group's focus was elsewhere. It adds tuple support, function support, and a lot of additional functionality around sequential Streams. The JDK 8's main efforts (default methods, lambdas, and the Stream API) were focused around maintaining backwards compatibility and implementing a functional API for parallelism.
http://www.jooq.org/products
Apache License 2.0
2.09k stars 168 forks source link

Add sources.jar to the latest (0.9.13) Maven release #332

Closed tlinkowski closed 6 years ago

tlinkowski commented 6 years ago

I started using jOOL 0.9.13 but there is no sources.jar file in Maven Central Repo so when I want to inspect any jOOL class/method I see decompiled bytecode instead, which is annoying.

Please, add sources.jar to the release, if possible.

http://search.maven.org/#search%7Cga%7C1%7Cjool

Versions:

lukaseder commented 6 years ago

Thanks for pointing this out. Indeed - weird there was no error from Sonatype. I'll look into this soon

lukaseder commented 6 years ago

Yeah, easy. The maven-source-plugin was accidentally removed when implementing #327.

Re-added the plugin: https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOL/commit/f24fbfc1339fbbf819cf088364733ce8e4754fae. Let's see if Maven Central allows for re-deploying only the sources.jar file, otherwise we'll need a 0.9.14 release...

lukaseder commented 6 years ago

Seems to have worked on the Sonatype console. Let's wait and see if the publication shows up correctly...

ansell commented 6 years ago

The timestamps are a little strange, as if the sources.jar was previously deployed correctly, but the files are there:

https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/org/jooq/jool/0.9.13/

Search.maven.org is still showing the source.jar file as not being there in its interface, but it can be accessed using:

https://search.maven.org/remotecontent?filepath=org/jooq/jool/0.9.13/jool-0.9.13-sources.jar

lukaseder commented 6 years ago

Thanks for the feedback, @ansell. Indeed, the timestamps are interesting, also interesting that not all files have been produced, e.g. the asc.md5 and asc.sha1 hashes are missing. Perhaps that's the reason why the search doesn't display it.

Downloading the sources using Eclipse seems to work, however, so I'll close this issue for now - I can live with this flaw.

I hope to be able to finally allocate some time to review @tlinkowski's many PR's from last year (really sorry for the delay!), so a version 0.9.14 might be published within some months.