Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Yes, I see your point, and agree it is something to consider.
But I really wouldn't want to mix permissions with public links, they are meant
for totally different things. Sometimes it is just easier to manage access
_within registered users_ if you set default permission to none, and then grant
access only for those who need it. But still it does not necessarily mean I
don't want to have public access.
I'd like to see some other solution. Some time ago I was thinking about
different kinds of public link scenarios, one being this simple "on/off"
method, but then there could more dynamic sharing where you could set
expiration for public links, maybe password, and of course ability to turn
sharing off, for each file individually. This method would require public link
storage, and is naturally a bit more complicated, but definitely possible.
Original comment by samuli.j...@gmail.com
on 15 Nov 2010 at 6:15
Thanks Samuli, your suggestions all sound good. Another thought maybe to have
an option to fire an email off to whoever with the public link and a message
from the file owner. If passworded then also include the password, or oblige
the recipient to register before they can download the file, using the email
address used to send the "invite". For flexibility it would still be good to
keep the public (no login /password)link available, but controllable.
Original comment by google.code@casanet.co.uk
on 15 Nov 2010 at 9:37
Issue 324 has been merged into this issue.
Original comment by samuli.j...@gmail.com
on 21 Nov 2011 at 5:16
Version 1.8.6 has now Share plugin, which allows controlling what items are
shared, and also to remove the share if needed. In future, there will be also
password protection, expiration time etc.
Original comment by samuli.j...@gmail.com
on 6 Jan 2012 at 8:20
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
google.code@casanet.co.uk
on 15 Nov 2010 at 6:05