Updates to Character Annex following pilot

[nickaddy]

Background

The Character report has been piloted on a live exercise - JAC00187 - and there are a few tweaks resulting.

Feature(s) Description

• [x] Fix the typo in the displayed response to the 'Has any other character issues' question

  

• [x] Fix the issue with the page number links at the bottom: when you click 3 or 4, the page content stays the same (however, the next (page) link does work

• [x] Numbers are displaying incorrectly next to S&S dropdowns (shows 18 in this case, but should not be 39)

  

• [x] Can the stage and status filters be set to default to SCC and Recommended to SCC respectively?

• [x] When the Recommended SCC approach filter is used, it only filters the entries on the page - it should search the entire report and then paginate if necessary

  

Acceptance Criteria

Definition of Done

• [ ] User stories/acceptance criteria met
• [ ] Internal reviews passed (feedback actioned)
• [ ] User testing passed
• [ ] Relevant technical documentation updated
• [ ] User guidance updated
• [ ] Deployed and merged without errors

User Testing Steps

Specify for users what is being tested (but not how to test it.)

[nickaddy]

Hey team! Please add your planning poker estimate with Zenhub @drieJAC @HalcyonJAC @tomlovesgithub @warrensearle

[HalcyonJAC]

@nickaddy I have one question. If candidates don't have any character issues, should they appear in the table? For the exercise JAC00187 there are 39 candidates in the SCC stage but only 18 candidates with character issues.

[nickaddy]

@HalcyonJAC Only candidates with character issues should appear in the character annex report, is that the way it works now? In this case, there are 39 candidates that fall into that category.

[nickaddy]

Looking at the report, I have an additional ask. Could we make it easier to distinguish between candidates on the report page, i.e. make this line bolder?

Could we also remove the word Candidate - it doesn't really add anything?