Open jackfirth opened 8 years ago
I think using the name struct->vector-lens
would be confusing because struct->vector
puts the extra struct:position
symbol at the beginning. struct->list-lens
would work for this though, because struct->list
doesn't include that symbol.
I forgot about struct->vector
, the lens form should match whatever that does. A struct->list
lens would have to be careful of the fact that struct->list
is only available in racket 6.3, I'd like to keep supporting the versions we do now.
We could support struct->list-lens
without relying on 6.3 if we looked at the struct-info and used the normal accessors, which we should probably be doing anyway.
Agreed, that would probably be the best way to do this.
Should this issue be closed because of https://github.com/jackfirth/lens/pull/266 ?
Given a structure id, it should be possible to construct an isomoprhism between struct instances of that type and vectors