Part of #179. Needs docs, and the existing singleton type docs already need some work as-is. Technically backwards-incompatible as it removes the #:type-representation-name option from define-singleton-type. That feature is nearly useless anyway and it doesn't make sense when the type is constructed in both the runtime phase and the compile-time phase.
Part of #179. Needs docs, and the existing singleton type docs already need some work as-is. Technically backwards-incompatible as it removes the
#:type-representation-nameoption fromdefine-singleton-type. That feature is nearly useless anyway and it doesn't make sense when the type is constructed in both the runtime phase and the compile-time phase.