Make request for new MC

cpawley commented 4 years ago

As discussed at Charm WG

cpawley commented 4 years ago

Tim mentioned the Lc monte carlo can be improved (perhaps to check/figure out)

jackfrost373 commented 4 years ago

The question was whether or not the Lc Dalitz decay model that was implemented, was based on a sound analysis. Otherwise we would be better off just taking the phase space decay.

In order to make the MC request, we need the following:

Lc and Xic signal size in data for our years (2011, 2012, 2016, 2017, 2018)
Lc and Xic signal size for the MC in 2017 (to know how bad it is without gen.level cuts)
Lc and Xic signal size in the stripping21 samples (to know how good it can get, and how much to request to match the data after the selection)

jackfrost373 commented 4 years ago

Tim mentioned the Lc monte carlo can be improved (perhaps to check/figure out)

(regarding the Lc Dalitz decay in MC: see https://gitlab.cern.ch/lhcb-datapkg/Gen/DecFiles/blob/v30r39/dkfiles/Lc_pKpi-res=LHCbAcceptance.dec )

cpawley commented 3 years ago

@jackfrost373 can we close now? MC IIRC has run over all polarities and years, we just need to get it via Ganga or AP

jackfrost373 commented 2 years ago

Did we request MC for all years now?

jackfrost373 / LHCb_Xic_production

Make request for new MC #41