Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
Swipe circles and digit buttons won't fit on small screens in portrait (xperia
mini). Attached a screenshot in fullscreen mode. Maybe the MathDoku "Play a
game" could be removed and that space could be used for timer and normal /
maybe mode button. The digit buttons could also be smaller.
Original comment by j6u...@gmail.com
on 11 Sep 2013 at 7:49
Attachments:
Going full screen doesn't matter for the grid size. The smallest dimension of
the display determines the size of the grid. The 1.96 version of the grid won't
come back. Also the action bar containing the mathdoku icon and title will not
be removed.
Button sizing needs to be optimized for smaller screen sizes.
Original comment by paul.din...@gmail.com
on 12 Sep 2013 at 8:00
Going fullscreen reveals at least the top-sides of 2nd row buttons. Previously
the grid was more or less the same size in both landscape and portrait. In 2.0
the buttons take half of the screen in landscape.
I disagree on the importance of showing the icon and "play a game". Obviously
the user isn't stupid and can see what's going on anyway.
Original comment by j6u...@gmail.com
on 12 Sep 2013 at 8:18
The size of the grid in landscape mode is indeed smaller than the same grid in
portrait mode. This is not caused by the buttons but because of the action bar.
As less height is available for the grid, also less width is needed to display
as the grid is a perfect square. As a result the buttons uses the remaining
space.
The action bar above the game is needed as more and more devices do not have a
menu button anymore. In such cases the action bar also holds a button to access
the menu. Access to the menu is rather essential.
Original comment by paul.din...@gmail.com
on 15 Sep 2013 at 6:38
Original comment by paul.din...@gmail.com
on 16 Sep 2013 at 8:41
I totally agree with the smaller size "complaint." It is harder too work with,
especially the size if the 'maybe' numbers in yellow. It was much better
before. I don't use swipe
Original comment by dennis.m...@gmail.com
on 5 Nov 2013 at 5:59
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
pww...@gmail.com
on 9 Sep 2013 at 11:51