I removed the unicode codepoints for tp_space and tp_combine, since they
don't have direct counterparts in the UCSUR proposal, and seem like
implementation details of the combining/word-splitting system. (the proposal
does have SITELEN PONA {STACKING,SCALING} JOINER but those are more
specific, and it recommends using a normal ZWJ for combining ideographs.
since ideograph combining seems kinda wip(?) I decided to just leave it
as-is.)
Reordered the table of unicode glyphs according to the new codepoints (the
non-pu words are the only ones that have a different order), as well as the
16px all-glyphs example. LMK if that's something you'd rather I revert, I
just did it cause they were previously ordered in the previous codepoint
order.
Also, I'm not sure why, but I think some of the glyphs might have changed verrrrry slightly. Maybe just fontforge upgrading them or something? idk, I could only notice when tabbing back and forth between the old version of the page and the new one.
Resolves #9. c.f. https://www.kreativekorp.com/ucsur/charts/sitelen.html
Couple things about what I did:
tp_spaceandtp_combine, since they don't have direct counterparts in the UCSUR proposal, and seem like implementation details of the combining/word-splitting system. (the proposal does haveSITELEN PONA {STACKING,SCALING} JOINERbut those are more specific, and it recommends using a normal ZWJ for combining ideographs. since ideograph combining seems kinda wip(?) I decided to just leave it as-is.)Also, I'm not sure why, but I think some of the glyphs might have changed verrrrry slightly. Maybe just fontforge upgrading them or something? idk, I could only notice when tabbing back and forth between the old version of the page and the new one.