Align `respondToCodeReview.ts` with `editFiles.ts` and `fixError.ts` Approaches

[kleneway]

Description

The respondToCodeReview.ts file currently uses a different approach compared to editFiles.ts and fixError.ts. To ensure consistency and maintainability across the codebase, we need to update respondToCodeReview.ts to match the methodologies and patterns used in these files.

Overview

The user can perform a code review on the PR by leaving comments on specific lines, and/or by leaving general comments in the review boy at the end. These variables are commentsOnSpecificLines and reviewBody. These contain the very specific items that need to be addressed. Ensure the function does not make any other changes to the code besides these!

Tasks

• Review the specific comments provided in ${commentsOnSpecificLines} and the general code review comments in ${reviewBody} and formulate a detailed plan to address each comment + review body.
• Refactor respondToCodeReview.ts to align with the structure and practices used in editFiles.ts and fixError.ts, based on the plan. in the plan util file create a new generateCodeReviewPlan function.

Expected Outcome

• respondToCodeReview.ts is refactored to follow the same approach as editFiles.ts and fixError.ts.
• All specific and general code review comments are satisfactorily addressed.
• A documented plan outlining how each general comment was resolved.
• The code is checked and committed back to the codebase @jacob-ai-bot

[jacob-ai-bot[bot]]

JACoB here...

You mentioned me on this issue and I am busy taking a look at it.

I'll continue to comment on this issue with status as I make progress.

[jacob-ai-bot[bot]]

Update

I've completed my initial work on this issue and have created a pull request: JACoB PR for Issue Align respondToCodeReview.ts with editFiles.ts and fixError.ts Approaches.

The changes currently result in an error, so I'll be making some additional changes before it is ready to merge.