Open mengtaotang opened 8 years ago
Great, thanks for the accurate report, I'll take a look as soon as I find some time!
Any update on this? I get the exact same error message with BEAGLE v0.27.2 when trying to fit photometry+spectral indices, though as 'standard' not upper limit.
@lukasfurtak that's quite strange, we use this functionality all the time with no issues, @ImaanBontle which version of Beagle are you using to run your MOSDEF fits of lines + photometry?
Hi @lukasfurtak I am also using BEAGLE v0.27.2, although I am not currently fitting any equivalent widths for my spectral indices, only fluxes and their errors. It is possible I have not yet run into this error.
Hi @jacopo-chevallard and @ImaanBontle, I used the same BEAGLE version. So this thing turned out to be a very strange object and Dan Stark's group managed to fit all of the EWs and photometry with some new templates they have after all. So I think in my case this was due to the limitations of the parameters I used to reproduce the weird SED of this galaxy.
I am using BEAGLE to fit both broadband photometry and emission line equivalent width measured from spectra simultaneously. It runs well if equivalent width type
ewType
is set to bestandard
orlower
. However, when I tried to fit EW whose value is treated as upper limit (upper
inewType
), I got problem that the likelihood function returns invalid value:Here is the parameter file that I used:
And spectroscopy & photometry catalogs, spectral indices configuration file & filter file are in the following link: https://www.dropbox.com/s/dvrww6vnmuj65op/beagle.tar?dl=0 The tar file contains: Spectral Indices Catalogue:
egs_spec.fits
; Photometry Catalogue:egs_phot.fits
; Spectral Indices Configuration:spec_config_RB16.data
; Filter File:filters_RB16.dat
; Parameter File:fit_egs.param
. Two EWs are going to be fitted: Ly-alpha EW and CIII] EW. CIII] EW hasewType
set asupper
, if it is set to bestandard
, the error message will be removed and BEAGLE will run.