jacopo-chevallard
commented
7 years ago Hi radha, I cannot be of help without the input parameter files attached... can you put them in a tar?
Closed rmastand closed 7 years ago
jacopo-chevallard
commented
7 years ago Hi radha, I cannot be of help without the input parameter files attached... can you put them in a tar?
rmastand
commented
7 years ago The files are attached: input_files.tar.gz
Apologies if this is an unrelated issue, but in case it's helpful: I still get the same error as above when I run these files, but when I run the docker comment 4 or more times in a row, the error changes to this:
There are 8 different filters specified
---> fixed sfh_type 0
---> fitted mass 0
---> fitted redshift 0
---> dependent nebular_logU 0
---> fixed nebular_xi 0
---> dependent nebular_Z 0
---> fixed attenuation_type 0
---> fitted tauV_eff 0
---> fixed mu 0
---> fitted tau 1
---> fitted metallicity 1
n_fitted: 5
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[WARNING: Parameter redshift not found. ]
[FUNCTION: "find_MCMC_parameter" ]
[MODULE: "parameters_handling" ]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[WARNING: Parameter tauV_eff not found. ]
[FUNCTION: "find_MCMC_parameter" ]
[MODULE: "parameters_handling" ]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[WARNING: Parameter tau not found. ]
[FUNCTION: "find_MCMC_parameter" ]
[MODULE: "parameters_handling" ]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[WARNING: Parameter metallicity not found. ]
[FUNCTION: "find_MCMC_parameter" ]
[MODULE: "parameters_handling" ]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Skipping object: 1.00000000000000
Skipping object: 2.00000000000000
Skipping object: 3.00000000000000
All observations have been fitted, or *lock files in the results directory prevent from fitting further objects
Total CPU time: 0.00000000 secondsA note -- I have tried this again with the most recent version (0.10.7) and am consistently getting the error above ("All observations have been fitted, or *lock files in the results directory prevent from fitting further objects"). The input files are the same as above as well.
jacopo-chevallard
commented
7 years ago hi radha, the second error that you're getting
All observations have been fitted, or *lock files in the results directory prevent from fitting further objects
tells you that you should remove all *lock files in the results directory, otherwise the objects will be skipped.
The first error that you were getting
Program received signal SIGSEGV: Segmentation fault - invalid memory reference.
Backtrace for this error:
#0 0x7F8F5BE22E08
#1 0x7F8F5BE21F90
#2 0x7F8F5B55449F
#3 0x6708CF in __lib_interpolation_MOD_locate_sp at lib_interpolation.f90:1172
#4 0x494860 in __parameters_handling_MOD_check_parameters_are_valid at parameters_handling.f90:814
#5 0x495D0A in __parameters_handling_MOD_set_and_change_galaxy_parameters at parameters_handling.f90:295
#6 0x45E674 in __likelihood_function_MOD_likelihood at likelihood_function.f90:123 (discriminator 4)
#7 0x4623D5 in __likelihood_function_MOD_mc_likelihood at likelihood_function.f90:93 (discriminator 4)
#8 0x4FD1C9 in __nested_sampling_MOD_getloglike at nested_sampling.f90:223 (discriminator 6)
#9 0x52FD50 in __nested_MOD_gen_initial_live at nested.F90:536
#10 0x5314CC in __nested_MOD_nestsample at nested.F90:352
#11 0x532564 in __nested_MOD_nestrun at nested.F90:239
#12 0x4FD5BC in __nested_sampling_MOD_run_nested_sampling at nested_sampling.f90:136
#13 0x4F7BA2 in __prosit_MOD_sample_pdf at PROSIT.f90:314
#14 0x40773E in MAIN__ at BEAGLE.f90:550was caused by using parameters for nebular emission with a model which does not include nebular emission. Try rather to use the attached parameter file and let me know if it works. Note that I added two more parameters, max_stellar_age and sfr. Depending on what you get with the current fitting, you can later decide to remove them.
rmastand
commented
7 years ago The new param file works great! I'm getting output files for both the example catalogue data and my own.
Just a note: this warning was thrown quite often:
-------------
[WARNING: After 1 attempts to draw a valid set of parameters, none valid set
has been found. Check that the input parameters range are compatible with the parameter
space spanned by the models you are currently using. ]
[FUNCTION: "set_and_change_galaxy_parameters" ]
[MODULE: "parameters_handling" ]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Obviously it's not keeping output files from being produced, but is this related to something in the param file?
jacopo-chevallard
commented
7 years ago Warnings are, in general, nothing to worry about, as long as you get sensible results in output! closing this issue
When running fit_photometry_example.param with beagle 0.9.2 (though I get the same error with beagle 0.7.2), I get the following error:
The errors / backtrace for this issue are identical to issue #31, even though the param files are different.