Hello! I'm trying to run BEAGLE v0.10.5 on some mock catalogue objects using the HST+NIRCam filters in our deep survey configuration, and the program seems to be hanging up after MultiNest generates the points:
$ BEAGLE --fit --parameter-file /home/kevinhainline/BEAGLE/BEAGLE-general-master/params/final_survey_photo_z/BEAGLE_photo_z_test.param
Reading Filter File: /home/kevinhainline/BEAGLE/BEAGLE-general-master/filters/FILTERBIN.RES
294 filters defined, out of 500 maximum ...done
---> fixed sfh_type 0
---> fitted mass 0
---> fitted redshift 0
---> dependent nebular_logU 0
---> fixed nebular_xi 0
---> dependent nebular_Z 0
---> fixed attenuation_type 0
---> fitted tauV_eff 0
---> fixed mu 0
---> fitted tau 1
---> fitted metallicity 1
n_fitted: 5
*****************************************************
MultiNest v3.9
Copyright Farhan Feroz & Mike Hobson
Release Oct 2014
no. of live points = 300
dimensionality = 5
*****************************************************
Starting MultiNest
generating live points
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--- LINEAR: X0 = 2.091E+02 is outside X range --- 9.000E+02 6.010E+04 2362
----------- Error reported only once, but it may occur more than once. ----------
...and it sits here.
I've tested the program using the fit photometry example code, and it runs fine. I've even resampled the filters that I'm using down to 400 lines each:
# It contains the filters to be used when calculating only photmetric models
# The possible units that can be used are: Jy, milliJy, microJy, nanoJy
# Alternatively one can pass a conversion factor to convert the fluxes in the
# catalogue into [erg s^-1 cm^-2 Hz^-1] -----> units:value:<conversion factor>
units:nanoJy
object_ID:colName:ID
index:279 min_rel_err:0.02 flux:colName:F435W fluxerr:colName:F435W_err label:F435W
index:280 min_rel_err:0.02 flux:colName:F606W fluxerr:colName:F606W_err label:F606W
index:281 min_rel_err:0.02 flux:colName:F775W fluxerr:colName:F775W_err label:F775W
index:282 min_rel_err:0.02 flux:colName:F814W fluxerr:colName:F814W_err label:F814W
index:283 min_rel_err:0.02 flux:colName:F850LP fluxerr:colName:F850LP_err label:F850LP
index:285 min_rel_err:0.02 flux:colName:F090W fluxerr:colName:F090W_err label:F090W
index:286 min_rel_err:0.02 flux:colName:F115W fluxerr:colName:F115W_err label:F115W
index:287 min_rel_err:0.02 flux:colName:F150W fluxerr:colName:F150W_err label:F150W
index:288 min_rel_err:0.02 flux:colName:F200W fluxerr:colName:F200W_err label:F200W
index:289 min_rel_err:0.02 flux:colName:F277W fluxerr:colName:F277W_err label:F277W
index:290 min_rel_err:0.02 flux:colName:F335M fluxerr:colName:F335M_err label:F335M
index:291 min_rel_err:0.02 flux:colName:F356W fluxerr:colName:F356W_err label:F356W
index:292 min_rel_err:0.02 flux:colName:fake fluxerr:colName:fake_err label:fake
index:293 min_rel_err:0.02 flux:colName:F410M fluxerr:colName:F410M_err label:F410M
index:294 min_rel_err:0.02 flux:colName:F444W fluxerr:colName:F444W_err label:F444W
I've included the data file, as well as my filterfrm.res file:
Hello! I'm trying to run BEAGLE v0.10.5 on some mock catalogue objects using the HST+NIRCam filters in our deep survey configuration, and the program seems to be hanging up after MultiNest generates the points:
...and it sits here.
I've tested the program using the fit photometry example code, and it runs fine. I've even resampled the filters that I'm using down to 400 lines each:
I've included the data file, as well as my filterfrm.res file:
BEAGLE_github_bug_3_21_17.zip
...and here is the parameter file: